As any major prize-giving event nears, you'll find an outcry for the addition fresh award types to recognize overlooked contributions and satisfy the hearts of enthusiasts with niche passions.
Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, this being a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front because like all blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification for why my demand is the most urgent and significant. Here's the proposal: We need an award type for logic-based games.
The Genre Classification Challenge
Classifying creative works is not a science; it remains highly personal, and inevitably spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. But it is an essential concession within the realm of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.
To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to be recognized, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.
Existing Game Classification System
Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these award types effectively encompass many game types, making space possible for most games within them.
This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No suitable classification appears to put them. Think about these outstanding current releases, all very different: the architectural riddles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.
Recognition Challenges
Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles launched regularly lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, unless they happen to qualify award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.
- An iconic brain-teaser wasn’t nominated completely in 2014
- A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
- Popular arranging title got ignored recently
- Only a few brain-teasers barely qualified for independent or mobile categories
Significance of Puzzle Games
Frequently they represent small games, but the art of the puzzle game holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games count as the most-played games globally and have been for an extended period.
The famous puzzle experience rivals well-known building titles competing to become most purchased experience; it also contends for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and engaging with diverse game types.
Recommendation and Reasoning
Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.
To emphasize again, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories in important events. Logic title developers are working at the challenging frontier interactive creation, developing some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. Don't make them wait decades.
